鲜花( 0) 鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
, l- G5 ]8 f& c- }Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs9 ^5 @& D% u- O- ^. j) q, w+ _
; N; P& g- E/ B/ s, z5 D! r$ v% pEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.* g7 O7 Z' w# d2 a% k
4 E4 ^+ F' z0 M, R6 X8 r/ ?: S
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. & q6 M v* i8 g3 |) |
, H5 m% H+ G7 x
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
) @) @+ P1 j7 Y# V) C, y5 L6 K% H1 C
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
; |$ W3 G) a% C) J+ @8 |2 @ g, P( u8 p2 r* p/ L8 Q
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
) T4 _. g3 R& d5 X+ Q& f- b- p1 w
1 H5 D' [2 }7 y0 m- F2 K7 G, `) \Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture., i4 Y3 U' K9 W0 q
& E& O; k( L, O, S8 F2 k
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.9 `: Q8 c/ q) w6 a7 D% H
9 l' g z4 N- X! |7 k; y8 M" Q, J2 W
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
% s8 x; g0 C: m6 U/ b) }) I; D. r& t8 j U( J+ Y$ V
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|