 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
楼主 |
发表于 2009-10-15 18:09
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 ares4p 于 2009-10-15 19:12 编辑 5 g' i, j" ]& d9 r; R# S/ ?* @
9 ^4 W$ R* |9 @3 H6 P* W
网友评论
^9 M, Q, t# J: j! c/ p" _. Z7 \# o( a) y; O: L$ w. X
/ d' ]( K$ G+ s- b0 a, o- IBeckyAllbarf wrote:
" d8 x+ L2 {2 ]- R( S" yPosted 2009/10/15
) ^7 [8 D6 X/ h2 p# Zat 1:35 PM ET L! q; q" p1 I$ }7 G0 ]4 _# A
* S3 O( h* n+ s8 z
0 W4 W2 i- i( D, z' { |* e( [
Is the RCMP moderating this fourm? Each of the three times I posted a question about the RCMP being in possession of information they are not releasing to the public, the moderator here refuses to post it. Again, the RCMP have Lahey's laptop. It was confisgated at the Ottawa airport. This means they have the hard drive for his laptop. His hard drive contains all of the information concerning who Lahey was sharing his child porn with and information concering who was sending the child porn to Lahey. The names may include other bishops, priests, cardinals, politicians, judges, law enforement officers, teachers, coaches, and who knows who else. Maybe this is why the RCMP has so far refused to let the public know who Lahey's child porn suppliers are. Make no mistake about it, the RCMP DOES have this information. They have the best forensic investigators available to them and they DO have the ability to examine a hard drive and identify all of the other pedophiles involved in Raymond Lahey's cyber-life. So why aren't they releasing this information? |
|
狗仔卡
发表于 2009-10-1 17:36
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
显身卡
