 鲜花( 10)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
楼主 |
发表于 2011-9-19 18:59
|
显示全部楼层
http://hi.baidu.com/%D6%ED%CD%C3 ... 088e40f819b8bb.html4 C( a: S; M: A- H3 T, I
8 i+ l2 F5 a3 T分享一篇文章：2010年1月基督教研究杂志会­
5 I M( ^& W" z# H9 K5 f; W
0 [2 ?! s" Y$ x' bDear Brothers,­
3 _- S' @( o/ X( m/ G; T1 A1 K4 w, T7 L! I4 s5 L
亲爱的弟兄们，­2 n. E7 z) n/ u( [. y, n
! j! f1 g- u0 y8 M% c+ n4 U/ r UThe January, 2010 issue of the Christian Research Journal will be dedicated almost entirely to Christian Research Institute’s change in position concerning the ministry of Watchman Nee and Witness Lee and the local churches. The title of the issue is “We Were Wrong.” The main content will be a long, seven-part article written by Elliot Miller, editor of the Journal. The issue will include a shorter “From the President” article by Hank Hanegraaff (also entitled “We Were Wrong”) and an additional article by Gretchen Passantino-Coburn.­
+ ]. F4 u( f9 i0 N' l, y$ {' s2 P/ r
) _# l$ C" V7 q% I+ r2010年1月一期的基督教研究杂志会将几乎全部篇幅让给基督教研究会（CRI)关于其对倪柝声和李常受之职事以及地方召会的立场的改变。这期杂志的题目是“我们错了”。主要的内容是由埃利亚特-米勒，该杂志主编，写的一篇分成七个部分的长篇文章。这一期杂志还将包括由汉克-哈尼格拉夫所写的短篇“来自会长”的文章（标题也是“我们错了”）和另外一篇附加的由格雷琴-帕萨迪诺女士写的文章。*注­: I. F5 u' u, l2 f. J
0 t# ^9 O8 U- wThis is an historic event. For the first time, some outside the churches have properly researched our teachings and practices and written an excellent defense of controversial teachings of Brother Nee and Brother Lee. While the articles are written by third parties from their particular perspectives and do not necessary reflect our views in every way, our teachings concerning, for example, the Triune God are strongly affirmed. We expect that the Journal will have a very positive impact on genuine seekers of the truth and do much to open further doors for the truth.­+ W/ C( G- ] i, c' @/ p: ]
+ x L. v0 v. v8 t6 h9 X7 x
这是一个历史性的事件。第一次，在众地方召会之外，有人正当地研究了我们的教训和实行，并对于倪弟兄和李弟兄的颇具争议的教训写了杰出的辩护文章。虽然这些文章是从第三方特别的视角写的，从而不一定在每一方面反映我们的观点，但我们的教训，比如三一神等，都得到了强有力地肯定。我们期待这期杂志将对真正寻求真理的人产生非常正面的影响，并对于进一步打开真理的门十分有益。­
9 r6 j/ d1 y' A% d: Z# m" m
2 ^" t/ E/ U6 P; A/ C- L* wElliot’s article addresses the four main areas of opposition raised in the so-called Open Letter, signed by over seventy evangelicals and posted on the Internet in January, 2007: the Triune God, God’s organic salvation/deification, the “legitimacy” of evangelical churches and denominations, and the three lawsuits dealing with defamatory books. For example:­% y: e$ L) J( R; t8 W5 [
/ }$ F7 b2 e8 x* k5 b
在2007年1月在互联网上张贴了一封由超过70个福音派人士签署的所谓公开信中，列举了对于地方召会四个主要反对的方面：三一神，神的生机拯救/成为神，众福音派教会及众宗派的“合法性”，和关于毁誉书籍的三项诉讼。埃利亚特的文章针对以上方面都作了回应。例如：­( m7 h# {2 L( m# J% T7 ~
, h* L7 Y6 A ^- }. d3 E7 }8 j
A section regarding the Triune God is titled, “Turning the Trinitarian Tables: What Evangelicals Can Learn from Witness Lee.”­& h/ Q7 ]% v) @/ \: T+ n8 X
. N* t9 I0 v# j0 S) H
一个关于三一神的部分的标题是: “转动三一论的桌子：福音派人士可以从李常受学习到什么。”­
, |9 q3 Z. z5 @( }7 y9 s; L! `" V, t( m
In one place, Elliot writes, “After one devotes sufficient time to studying LC materials in context, dialoguing with its leaders and members, and observing them as they live out their individual Christian lives and collective church life, an irresistible conclusion is reached: this group is not only Christian but it is in many ways an exemplary group of Christians.”­9 O, g# z: B: X3 h; ~; n$ r
% R: }9 v, O; }" I. n. E
在一处，埃利亚特写到，“在一个人花足够的时间研究地方召会的材料并注重其上下文，与其领头者和成员对话，并观察他们活出个人基督徒生活和团体的召会生活，我们无法抵挡的一个结论是：这个团体不但是基督徒，并且在许多方面是一个模范的基督徒团体。”­
8 Y# [% i. Y, `! G' a7 D% s9 o4 Z( h2 P! h7 H$ ~0 o
In reference to The God-Men trial, the article says, “Although SCP claims that the LC deliberately dragged the trial out so that SCP would be forced into bankruptcy and thus unable to make a defense, the information that came out against them in depositions and expert testimony makes it hard to imagine what kind of defense they could have mounted…”­5 ~- Q% S E# U, K
; d+ [% j% d2 m' T
在提到《神人》毁誉一案审理时，文章说，“虽然SCP宣称地方召会故意引出诉讼审理，以至于SCP被迫陷入破产倒闭境地而无法为自己辩护，但物证和专家证言所传递出的反对SCP的信息，使人们很难想象他们还能作出什么样的辩护...”­
" Y+ k+ I# }& c3 G8 X: |$ |9 s) p) K: M9 K! L$ i9 c+ `
（以下为该杂志的订购信息，略去不译。）­
% d. l/ g$ \, C: X! h6 p6 @+ X2 H+ w# ]' T: W( m
信的署名是：­& m2 y3 `3 y, L: a5 f, D3 K; K
7 Z; s2 Z- \8 P1 dDan Towle Dan Sady­
, S* U2 W* A0 v# K3 Y- f# m# \6 w: V. B; @6 N' q
注：帕萨迪诺女士是美国真道实践会（基督教护教机构，专门研究并反对各种异端的），曾在80年代写书反对地方召会和李常受弟兄的职事。近两年来通过和美国及中国的地方召会的弟兄姊妹接触，并研究我们中间的神学思想，对我们的神学完全改观，转而为我们说话。曾在香港举办的华人神学思想研讨会上发表对于地方召会之改观的长篇见证交通。­
+ K6 i8 d6 s* m/ J* K; k+ m: z7 G1 |4 |5 H" k
埃利亚特-米勒是美国基督教研究会人员，汉克-哈尼格拉夫是美国最大基督教电台的负责人，任该电台的圣经解答人，（Bible Answerman），该电台拥有几百万美国听众。­
h6 J$ F1 ?: m' }. g; H2 v! I( X. Z& n( k6 ?
埃利亚特和汉克都来过大陆，走访过上海，南京，北京等地。跟主恢复中的各地召会的圣徒有过接触，得知国内信徒因为信仰的缘故为主受苦，深感钦佩，并且说中国的弟兄姊妹要为美国安逸的弟兄姊妹们祷告，要求神复兴美国的基督徒。他们的大陆之行，使他们对主恢复中的地方召会留下深刻良好的印象。­ |
|
狗仔卡
发表于 2011-7-16 17:30
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
显身卡
发表于 2011-7-16 18:58
