鲜花( 0) 鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable , r. z" b0 E; I) l7 Z
( J; v6 u) o9 \+ y
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -* }) t) ]* |6 ~5 u- N
/ O% v! V4 A$ X0 S z+ `5 d
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market' O+ e: c. ~* G" @
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
T5 E8 R( M: ]9 E, [quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic3 W+ k9 w0 a3 P4 i
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit* f) w1 X/ x4 {& A5 g' l) e
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and+ |. f& N3 Z% x$ G( V; M
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,6 T8 e6 q/ r: |, c* i% B3 m
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal; @; g& c2 f( p6 b8 @
LePage Real Estate Services.
. e" r }. L4 E* M7 G6 m
! w# V3 X, Z( v Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
M7 Y. ?7 ?% ^' Q! aare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic: P* \/ i% s0 X
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and" h# T L2 h7 j0 e
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the. }0 [' ?& I) A% T; Y
residential real estate sector.
# M8 v" K4 i9 v: \- X) D1 d
- M |( o& S/ _% A$ R2 H Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
8 @" h$ H9 C) p3 l, Noccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%); G& u ?1 h s1 q
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562' v/ a3 u5 v/ J; m+ h9 {7 H( |
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3801 Z7 A! ?5 ^6 A( U( b, Y
(+13.2%).4 K' Q# g& i2 Y8 E
J2 M" w1 {( S0 F( v; `, Y N6 c
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth; E% E7 h* w6 [, P* N- y
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
0 s Y0 P7 H9 v3 G/ Wfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
9 w4 f% e$ Q& \6 y' ?9 R* rpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,! {% t7 \) R% r r! \" \( G, n3 |3 H5 z
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
3 Q8 V: m3 K2 R# o"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We# e6 b4 w1 O- `/ [2 K9 S) s
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
9 T3 s) g1 B4 j/ N u& O# N2 kbalanced market."# T5 P6 o$ {/ t- [5 P u
1 T, m+ {# j: V' N
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,3 T4 R6 V9 n7 {" b1 \' D2 ?& E8 t
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift8 U3 M/ w! F( q7 @* T4 P1 s1 |4 E
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued. n7 s1 C0 t- K
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
, {2 H) \, @' nenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,* _9 G, a4 d3 g. O7 z
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
* f h6 B; o5 J9 P3 Zbreaking price appreciations.2 @/ O/ ?+ h: u5 ~+ F# N# h7 x
+ J$ H' R7 W4 N2 V
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding7 V/ A. V; Y. V
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
: k$ \1 W' a5 V/ h# e! Z. qlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
7 `6 P: N K" [# c7 [ D+ B) [; i* L' e8 p
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
1 g8 o! w7 B- {$ Seconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer8 L) W+ y& l7 x" b
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
$ J- ^+ l$ h# ^, K! Nslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth./ ~3 D. o. t, z- ~
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
6 m7 c f4 n W( i; C3 v/ ^greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of" ]# m4 p! w) I) n, T( c! @
price appreciation when compared with 2005.- ~" B( T! H8 U! v* L& x
- u8 D1 L# [: r6 g% N* G4 F
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing0 B7 V: ?5 \* d) l
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and5 e' @' C( @) q7 x9 ]2 y$ T6 E
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada( x% U6 l5 q, b$ S1 A
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
7 @- e7 x, a1 F
8 }, _- U+ Z5 D$ K5 d l+ Y0 d Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
3 W" z; h8 K) EAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
% r# H9 N0 j3 B& zfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the+ A' ]. o& `# A9 M
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general R, c3 R$ R" D6 n" u* j
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the$ I0 _4 o0 T. H# q
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and. J. J- J) ]% j) ?% V3 E. s
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization9 g1 }( ~; C @( z7 o9 o
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
" H5 ]. x5 @0 B# M. i* D( o" x- C: g) J; }6 B& @: W0 v/ w
<<
1 |5 G! j( ~1 a5 Y# O. O) i REGIONAL SUMMARIES6 [3 ~5 }5 v" a( c& [
>>* G) t4 V7 U0 z- S* G
: e! [0 z Q% W' r! i+ w& \" R, X7 v
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
: Y, |4 @7 _- B ?Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate3 p6 a# u9 r# L* L1 }
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
1 ?- v* V' X5 t, Llooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
. Q- F: o: ?8 r4 y* _2 S8 nrenovations.
- C# m8 V# K! s a) d1 f/ Y& u$ p. t& B$ p2 s
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight% w" c3 N3 e5 e1 I% `% P
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation/ k- j ^/ g9 Q2 n. b2 ~3 A4 Q
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
6 \% y' ^/ a/ T* u0 ^9 a7 lSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.5 N- ^/ f7 I6 M: T' H, |
7 h5 Q4 a5 Z8 L7 N P+ n `
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer* E, P5 ^" ]' j0 n
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the0 n6 L: f' p! H5 e/ L
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
$ ]* U2 V, l# q! ]- E600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
7 I. p8 i5 B# N9 A% F% D8 j: Bto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
& @( `3 I: c1 d/ Dand are instead opting for more affordable housing options., @, k2 i/ f9 I6 B
% p+ [ R- I* {0 V% S% |; E
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced' G+ s9 {. u4 q/ \0 _4 Q2 o; t& n N
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their% M8 l8 h! \0 R1 W5 V$ d* J U$ t( x
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
4 a, q" `: }4 ` t4 }" U2 vwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
6 W. t2 X" m% b, ddollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
+ A i5 T. j8 d- O) ^0 r- Ubuyers with more options when looking for a home./ K% d8 Q7 ^; A
; L( o$ k/ ^7 o! t Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly3 f# |7 x& |% t5 s: b" x
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
( f- H/ u$ o Y* k6 o% f8 Q8 }- Vpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,. o( F7 D- [ h# o# u& h
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
& `: W0 {: T4 g O) z8 U8 @few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
& b2 a3 ^' ^/ A9 Z7 N4 g B
, j, A. B% _9 u" b; M Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
- L/ X7 I1 t% A$ f* t* \prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
Q6 y% V, G! m5 p0 r' Slevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
3 x. O+ L0 f/ V1 V3 yfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
# i3 F2 z7 z0 N# lwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the' ~& F( L# m! b% [8 ~4 n
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
y. m% Z; U- a; r+ rmaking a purchase.! s# ^) W% J& m, r1 s
! C) O; R' [( W# g
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
; g' O, t' Q2 Y1 j( f7 b4 z0 ^+ Vmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
3 t# z% g; \$ ?' F7 K e+ p- e' R8 }confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city: |* b, S9 K2 d5 P: y
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
5 A$ i- b' S) ~) X% ?* r. u6 ]' Oattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
- P, u: Z2 j2 n7 `9 y' y4 x3 @amenities.
" B0 I: \) }9 L! T* o5 `# o- m5 Z1 \; K3 _# R$ ^& u# \
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
* \+ _0 d2 R% f0 q& K1 Ythroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
: E0 D" }( q- `& ~. }8 Wacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has' \) h! N3 E/ a. v, z) k
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been; Y& F# w6 b( q: p6 n' ?0 l
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
" x; [1 p4 G9 I6 E$ Y! Wresidence, rather than for investment.# h2 o' _( W' A l5 D
2 S$ Q* U2 V1 l( }( n( Q, H The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as7 T- d( r, ~/ ^
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
8 H: Z' N$ o" a# Q" ~( uin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
/ P x3 B/ }# O: X) `& d& c* w w8 @confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
+ o- ~8 r- ?$ }$ w7 Vrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter& M3 ]: l* d1 c3 Y! z4 ]$ z6 b$ ^8 H
the market.
/ [" c' a$ i1 w i0 n+ h7 w
3 _ t8 |1 G' X0 Z) ]1 Q) h In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
- ^% Z% D3 l, L) b9 B2 UJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
& U, H9 s$ ?$ s7 t9 nAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
+ r0 q5 l% q. Z3 v1 Qmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
4 @# ^# D- B t$ B, z2 pto the shortage of available inventory.
6 g1 S8 v- L. b! S9 R% o: m+ O. p' X. p
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its; x/ p7 M* V& I/ g
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains2 B2 A3 l$ D' x: ?6 e
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
2 C2 A2 k) N p i8 n# x& @struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.4 n6 L: l- p$ N1 h( M9 p
0 c7 N+ M, c: m; C* O# ` Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
: w# M. \2 m/ L" w, v4 zin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
1 u( z! z( Q% q x* @. w; I- K1 ~unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
0 x* d' m! k7 p- o4 Tpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
5 j% x. R M; o9 `# T+ P+ Q+ dprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
3 c! A# ^1 m3 dseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
$ p7 n# Z7 m: k4 u1 ^2 Sbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
3 G% X0 t7 @* q! M. z* q( R
& ?9 T+ K8 t4 C& O) z Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
! J" Z* w$ }% Q: }3 p& j4 A1 Jas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
# k7 N5 C# W6 nremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
, i) Z0 r7 I/ Imaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices( ~ v/ a$ a% U
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve6 \; A& S( Y, G6 X
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
. c% I9 x* O6 M1 W' }# Ytowards the end of 2006. ; K ~: q$ z, x; q& b
. |; y0 }+ ~2 \3 z; U2 d2 I7 w
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of& {- m% n9 o$ \
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable; E9 z$ |/ C, K- E$ D/ F& _
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
3 M" M5 t: v) ^' d9 I+ @group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
L' k3 {2 j6 m3 {/ ? @4 dforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added2 z* b" Z+ Z2 c& R: ~
pressure on tight inventory levels.
3 e' E( A {: ?
. F# W6 L* f1 {% U8 D, n) n Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
3 p4 U; q4 u" [4 [- Y( ^9 Gfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
: T# X7 b+ n. }) s( Linto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
3 m% l# C# Q; Y& M6 f% Kwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching8 _2 K% ]; |& a7 M/ x3 ~+ F
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.' `+ F' Z+ G1 F# B
' `0 D( u! [& J <<- F$ ?$ s* c' t- K
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
' t) |) q8 H) \8 T5 B6 j& k6 T A9 l: s; Z9 j3 ~# T4 y, W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 [# P# _5 v/ z b* C
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
; ?% R4 W1 Z; ]* u6 f& X2 u -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" f0 C, s9 d3 q% H1 ?+ Z 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3! s# D: |) R, j7 @3 r
Market Average Average % Change Average Average* N" ?) [2 P2 b! o+ |8 e. r- |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# L* j- K( ~+ d$ Q Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
; l- b" \ a6 v# }% {5 Q8 T* h -------------------------------------------------------------------------. c9 U+ R/ C7 S5 y6 w5 o
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0003 E) q' p9 h! e# p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ D ?6 s9 a4 ?$ i
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
' t6 c0 e) L3 K+ J X8 M -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; ^& C4 w4 S& A7 U( p- B Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -% T) p; n7 U: @- v( F) O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! e/ g1 _8 G" i! A
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
' i9 W& c/ C% @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 J) r( n; ?; \9 `2 [* g
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
2 L, w% e! t0 r$ W" i -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, D9 C: K* c! d/ k( f( k Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185! M5 I& _6 O' d2 B C% Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 Y0 p0 `+ U% n: z) ]$ }+ v
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
0 |* Z/ {0 [: O7 u4 M% U/ y -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 p/ c7 H1 r: j5 ~$ u9 [3 S6 Z1 L
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766+ M8 R p5 v. f& `3 b7 B' a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: ` a: Q' v2 T' N4 G Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707* v2 C% i: }/ X5 Y- \5 R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, l \5 N5 Z6 X; A' }/ t
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
+ f3 K+ I% T7 k# S" m/ N+ e -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ s. Q3 T4 u0 y* Q- a2 o
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
' _5 i! {! N, V5 k9 f% e -------------------------------------------------------------------------' t7 b7 B5 y4 t3 H+ ~2 w
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714$ [9 {9 B. w8 X) t% S( ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
X. P0 W9 I% a2 y. I: Q4 ~ Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
# W C/ e2 S/ M$ M9 T' R' \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 G: v. C h2 |( [+ Q; ^
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
/ W+ A+ N5 D5 i2 N -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 a8 L3 @ ^, U8 C National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
! j$ v* p' o5 M/ \+ U$ i3 V% u8 b -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% h/ P# L$ I3 L' U& O. {! M" h' Y" ~: P) W# L' `9 f; t% ?
-------------------------------------------------------------: ]7 S$ ? T0 y* s
Standard Condominium
; v, ?5 r6 B. F& ` m0 b# l$ c; K7 g -------------------------------------------------------------
: z, L5 ]* t! \7 j! L g l9 m 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
) [1 L5 [0 S* G" I/ ]8 w& s Market % Change Average Average % Change% x' u5 C) v9 ^; e5 Y( K
-------------------------------------------------------------. |8 w8 e9 J3 ^6 I
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
, O' o; T- L _4 G' g -------------------------------------------------------------) e! j# b9 ?# n' X8 g: e8 b
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%0 R6 h- E* V' J+ T
-------------------------------------------------------------% B: |: L4 Y) ]6 p% j% o
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A& T% K& y# t0 N7 U6 v1 t1 I k4 {# b
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ Q, h, x q" r0 h/ s Saint John N/A - - N/A
9 R; V/ p/ y+ s# ]* v7 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------
9 U5 ^: M# U7 ~" M2 H St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
1 T2 k% C5 y4 }9 | -------------------------------------------------------------2 m2 c& F7 I% |6 l
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%0 a+ F& ], r& X' i% j" P9 E1 h
-------------------------------------------------------------
% g/ G5 Y4 v3 ?8 v. k Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
8 M% B5 E7 j* m+ q% `# s4 y -------------------------------------------------------------8 l* ^) p4 o# G7 ? T
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
+ v8 m0 e8 Q4 O! [1 {( `9 b6 G -------------------------------------------------------------. C. c/ I6 n; p, q4 o. h0 N
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
% D. d% f' @, ]4 I3 p -------------------------------------------------------------1 _% D- I- k& p. b
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
8 [9 n# `. Z5 T; Q -------------------------------------------------------------
, M* {9 }- U, I9 E3 ` Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
( |+ @. e( ~! ^: n) Q -------------------------------------------------------------
+ G& x8 O2 O; x% A/ @1 B' ^ Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
2 W! H7 K3 L5 Z. R* T# z& [ -------------------------------------------------------------$ k7 K& C8 C- B4 W% A* K
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
' \, x* C) I7 o8 B6 e -------------------------------------------------------------2 K8 s) l, A5 [. ^4 V$ n$ `
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
/ |# ^& |# T, m( T+ s" a -------------------------------------------------------------
4 }6 ?$ Q* B; j& n7 g! Z/ \ Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%) U( r t' F0 n2 ], g: @. u/ J
-------------------------------------------------------------
. Z8 Q$ o* [' G( P+ } National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%6 P5 o! P" V5 h
-------------------------------------------------------------$ |1 R2 G( J* C* u
>>
/ q/ F+ O. K5 C8 b$ Q9 G. m" b* `" ]" X3 W9 S& v0 s3 r
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
1 p; k. c3 U7 ]' Yin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
' ]0 o+ c. b: B q. t$ SJohn and Victoria.7 E3 R4 k: @2 D- `' S
6 B# Z* P) P# E V& I5 e7 \; S
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
4 [( c$ [6 c; P+ ^3 c, `* ?$ X- mcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
6 J3 Z* T3 Q E1 Yhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release" K; _8 {7 L/ ?4 H( G
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price, c V& z3 l) g# e; Q! m
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities) ]5 x0 b. C3 y' h5 J$ z
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
2 G# W' G4 U* A$ w# S" V# z- ]available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current* W# |" V( ^; }/ E' a9 z
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable, A5 E# i* M/ X( c
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
7 |$ @( N, L2 u' m1 m9 R/ v( w7 UNovember 15, 2006.% ?# U3 ]# Q( h! f
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of8 r) ^# l; Z. \; M' ]0 h
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge+ z- P: Q! x w& I
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is# W; y8 v0 J) O6 K" i6 Q1 I
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|