Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
, f) h( H3 w4 {- t$ E0 Z: {& b
. Y1 F: K! S# Y- KNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
' X* ?/ F& m& h- k- k* Q8 H% s7 \/ H
" R  V' y" J! ^. F) t5 E3 I: DLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

5 c5 r6 H/ ]  i/ U: J3 Z* nTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

9 h/ {  `7 }; G4 n
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
) R2 i# W! ]4 e: m
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
" W* v; ]# L7 f# G4 ]0 t  N
Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
; h0 @- v: C7 K1 GLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
3 H  l- N; M9 G7 [Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
  a* m- V6 c' q! |) ?) l0 @
2 B  O% T0 q1 a6 [- w. G4 f& O

' d4 T, G4 Y/ l$ ^$ H5 I) K  tIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
, d( Y& z+ E' a  {/ e, H
% v. z! ?; s; _+ S7 `% |( }
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
6 a& Z& D6 o3 R6 b. F: O$ {, ]
it would be a good reference.

- h/ T2 x( d0 y+ hthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
5 O' P. M7 H+ E) l1 X1 B" _' |$ W) d2 d
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]