鲜花( 0) 鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
& E E3 b; A8 T4 w- s
' B. Y+ G' B& v- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
! r2 o1 Z2 R( _! z! H1 E
( T! I/ m( P9 S4 b2 ^5 c TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
2 x# d5 |, v* L1 s) T' N6 wexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third# }; i C# M4 v4 r. q: @
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
7 K4 N# I4 m4 `1 Q5 xin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit7 } A7 w/ X) \4 Q1 e1 m
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and2 ?. d$ H0 K# G. k) h
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
* N `1 Z' B, v$ zQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
2 K+ w5 U3 e* N/ P, e8 ^LePage Real Estate Services.3 w7 ?. R2 u- u; ^
m! ~; F! [% U% M6 [3 |' |/ c+ O
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters! k0 |, n Z, v# H, w+ d& X
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic# m" M8 R7 k$ C* R
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and/ b; E4 Q0 J! F8 r! n1 o; s0 a
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the( u/ B. W# D8 A7 z) }9 c* D w
residential real estate sector.
$ B7 |% J$ ^7 U: q, i2 z2 a, C( u% f7 r) B
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
$ ^+ K/ u4 e# K0 u: W9 woccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
H; i/ J- x; v' ?year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562& O( u: U' z; T
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
6 S% D5 d: R; M' E! o2 b& G(+13.2%)." p* @, M6 z. r7 |% T5 h2 z+ h
1 @7 {* G& c8 A) W5 V3 a "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
% V1 M) ?5 g) J4 |4 H5 I/ _during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
. ^- \$ Y. z. m# R5 \frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are1 V8 t/ C9 ~& w3 o9 j# L+ `
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
( V: ^) m3 y H2 ~president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
% X3 B8 F8 g+ A) \' I) G"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We% @! y9 v, y9 t! ~2 ^+ h+ N
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy: R. ]( x3 h# O8 F( v1 V7 O. z
balanced market."
: X: ]# E1 u0 ?7 l- I: d: F( `7 R4 {# V; L) J7 W
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,* r% F9 X7 [" h- d0 N
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
3 _, s. i E; lto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
8 Q. p( @/ G1 M) ~throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core, U; u% h8 _' s$ I# m) ?( @
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,2 r2 `. U( b: H- s# D
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
7 x7 c' Y4 w+ H' L4 L( M0 Wbreaking price appreciations., j9 T' {, [' {5 f' j; F2 A9 w
9 Y7 }) b ?# ?' q L5 i* H
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding$ A+ f. y" a( h5 x
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the$ t3 c( d8 K5 F2 `: l6 ?
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.( V' x- t' A- e( t5 z/ @
1 p! T' |! S) b+ L0 b0 V In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
3 L% ]' ]9 {' [2 A- r: r8 R$ Q% weconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
! x1 e, T: E4 {. cconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
6 c: h- B) D: J t% B. p+ `% [slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.9 s+ J$ M0 n4 I+ @5 r+ T# y
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers, G9 ^1 W7 I! c# q; z, G0 U ~
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
) f9 ]- X( k; R' } d/ Q9 ^) [price appreciation when compared with 2005.
# @, k# i4 Y8 Y) u4 U* o) ?% |4 q0 [' J: o0 x
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
2 t9 j4 f5 t( U: i8 e4 d8 K' t) umarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and, C0 F3 k3 z- L2 L, q8 }. R
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada$ u* l3 U7 | S8 J, }' w
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
% m: C9 @! h' v1 w! D; ?2 o4 ]% m* p% `0 ^) L
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the5 C$ n6 ~- V2 S- B
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's1 b* |7 B. \: s& j# `
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the/ P9 \( ?# W$ C" ]- _+ L
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general8 `) g& J& u) M# F$ W& y
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
6 s3 e1 T7 R+ Q9 Y6 ndownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
) V( J9 U7 }1 `7 x) [( B$ H* Kaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
; c: i& v2 [( nmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."; _; T- p1 [) V$ L& y$ Y
4 j8 z# E, ]4 o. E; H <<
, r+ [1 p) B [ O+ g2 n REGIONAL SUMMARIES
/ W# b! S. d6 g >>6 Z# a9 U$ j' e) Q- [" \
6 e9 b) [# M- _3 X( H1 A; W% B Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
! \1 F% I# ^" y& pHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
. N5 Z7 c( ]5 m, c- Q0 Eof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
1 z7 v. I* t+ R1 f; V8 f& E3 [looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of: c D$ q% d7 u+ R9 z3 E
renovations.8 Q) {8 \' t3 b0 `$ u
$ T7 c* G, j9 b5 E0 Q. k4 J The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight( j n A: ^3 x3 }
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
# U: X3 \' h% \8 e0 Gcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
% q* S6 I$ K& fSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
, E4 W5 q% z6 P
3 v% ~: W1 s$ H# _& e6 w The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
+ D: n8 U# a& R* t# ~slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
! Q$ f# a6 i- ]) hquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
4 l% _3 S$ b& H7 o% r6 p! u600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
) P; p8 p; D# g' h" @to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes! @" r, J9 z( }; W' _6 R: M! n, u4 _
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.9 R8 n. ~# @9 U3 ^) a
9 B" D" ^; M" a/ |9 h In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced# z3 [$ p- L3 G- E0 D( Q( R
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
% g9 o2 {. R, w( z( Bhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers' S l% [4 [! v( b2 x
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian4 y7 m9 z$ a; n( H
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing7 _3 P5 h. _6 q9 w7 r* L! E; c) F
buyers with more options when looking for a home./ }; l+ V) ]2 R9 L; E/ z
8 ] r; \: F, ^3 F5 u8 n Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly* O g8 b' z3 [- U
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes! H4 A$ c( q3 p9 j
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,2 ]- _; x. g! u2 a; }
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
3 ^8 b; S3 \0 y) P8 bfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.3 }- I) K9 V- F* D
! W( H8 K, e4 C) I; P1 G# t Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
. R; t) Y/ `) e) W" D+ X( oprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory) |- e/ w$ r, M! b5 k
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting# d/ v0 [, K/ X# Y. H
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1, L( a( E, a1 `: j3 t& [
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
" U" ?& k# D, K* ~2 V% ]3 tpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before, C. G- g( {0 ?6 q5 \* Y
making a purchase.4 z. z2 q$ c1 _ S1 ?" C7 I, T/ @
0 o( O/ i4 z" u# v7 Z
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing2 F; O$ z* Y4 l! Q0 }! t
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
( c& v3 A. `3 ?- P5 u7 b- yconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city$ I6 V2 {3 M @* `& c; g) [
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
7 k K0 O [8 N, b. r2 xattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
7 e9 F1 _0 G" e: \9 h: iamenities.
; {0 l. j# `! }- n( O
5 g$ l, N/ D' v2 z0 B5 q# O: C The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
& V2 q# Y$ ?- _, W: N5 dthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
) u# ~3 \ F; l4 I0 n7 cacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has2 W& @( h3 M6 |; r
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
$ Z2 l' r J; P3 l0 t! d* zdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle6 [1 }3 V% o; x: g6 F
residence, rather than for investment.$ n+ a' X: a0 H, s0 p8 A+ X+ E
6 U a3 Q% g! U5 |3 g% E9 s The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
, G- O4 f# D9 a/ ehouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted, f6 K# P% U- c& h
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
6 y7 T* `6 `3 h; g; ]" ]3 t/ hconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization0 V; P4 b" p- ?' ?! g
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
% }" o# Z# Y# I8 M6 o0 a0 P# zthe market.
( W- r4 l5 c" F
% n/ t' Q6 j* a5 v In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
, H9 y% ^( G% C# o" k* HJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In. |2 n/ l- p8 _. u5 z6 F+ ]
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring/ V+ q( O/ C8 j9 {- z; g9 {
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
@& G! F1 u4 V8 M$ y0 yto the shortage of available inventory.- o$ L0 C, ]' Y/ k2 p& \# V V3 o( m8 G
6 o! g+ ?6 b6 v9 @: _
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
9 d" z6 C/ ]9 h. y. amomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains3 l: J7 J2 j9 k% ^! Q: o! [2 e* N- g
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses# Y- ?& e- ~/ p# u
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.9 c) @8 h2 H, w1 \$ @% o+ W
. [) i" c9 H7 _9 ] Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
" n" f. i* h/ f# m' `$ Q: k7 A4 A9 F# F2 _in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low2 E) g3 `& u) x$ y( E! s% v# E
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that) ]6 `9 J& x9 t/ u; t
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring2 h3 e/ v5 M& Z# R' n5 k- {
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
" _4 a# k: C1 N* Y3 Tseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as1 [1 M/ t$ j5 \: s: |( N
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
9 O% E3 }5 I/ H3 m! s' H* ? ~' g$ ]! I# R4 r' f+ J6 N; W, O
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
5 R$ c2 x9 _6 ~! m2 y @as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton! E6 q3 u; B! W# x Y7 x, Y0 o
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
! a' n$ G0 }2 z- t" ]1 N. Hmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
: k, |. g( H' J+ [& Sincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
4 x2 `) I1 ^: b- v+ z1 yin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
& \/ R9 @( w# T) Mtowards the end of 2006. - q9 _7 x# i7 R2 j" L& `! n0 r
; Q' z5 i+ Y1 [/ HWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of/ o( T1 v* f2 A6 b% o( u- V
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable1 u* k3 c1 b; u- E. h9 A9 c( b
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
! p7 }; Q" K/ O% k: Y: Ygroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to; k2 ~& _8 _# U" i# p; A! ?
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
- m5 ?$ Z8 V) ^4 _3 P. S4 jpressure on tight inventory levels.
8 I$ p4 e/ ?# F' h0 Y F: Z# f; E# e% H+ I
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
" h f$ l* i6 y3 B/ ufundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
1 ~/ @( f( B6 w; F4 U1 p7 rinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;+ }9 L$ N! B* |4 L/ {
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
9 e" d, p0 M( \# D, q1 L4 vfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
6 v5 F# Y: W) o5 ^# g1 A. ?+ [8 D9 a( n, b+ U# ~5 l
<<* m" M# u2 @! ^# q& t, u% N
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006% h! ^2 Y1 d: A- m. w8 ^5 k
# I7 H7 E! y6 Z( v- W1 F: Z; i -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) i3 ]9 z6 c4 E" k$ {2 K U* w* @ Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey- c, {, F6 p; \7 T( j' g8 }( R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 l6 o8 \' Z6 \# c 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
$ q3 _9 i& F# O& ?) W Z' \ Market Average Average % Change Average Average
1 k7 T0 P+ Q1 a* C7 l! l: ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" y/ z- k+ l' U- W Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
. y; m/ i3 g- d0 K5 K( N+ \! A -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 @+ W5 i0 x5 _+ e5 K1 G$ p* l Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
2 z [0 m1 n+ |) t+ q- v -------------------------------------------------------------------------" b% _+ T- j" `
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
* N: ~, ]: e: Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, ?" l, ~+ Y: v3 o Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -+ L) y5 @/ @+ F% j4 W' l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- q( g) \" T7 ] |0 Q
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333& A0 [; B* V1 p6 t6 M- s; k; t' b8 _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! ^/ ~0 _1 g+ A+ ]; d
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
3 t" l1 d4 F8 S. e8 g3 z -------------------------------------------------------------------------) m( o5 c7 f: l @
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
( y) L) R/ [9 y9 W/ u -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. s6 t# P _: Y/ U+ } Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
/ S0 r/ G& |% `5 T$ a% b5 `. R -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 }$ r3 ~ @5 y J Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
( S! U* `/ F) P( ~ @% k# A/ f( j -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& F* K Q6 z _, [# ` Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
; p0 x7 d7 w6 O' f -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 l% `8 Q/ L: j+ p4 J; Z Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500" Q3 ]/ o1 T. `# [0 ]; w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 D* R6 s' [0 Y8 Z8 ~, [7 D; n
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389! z- Y* s. C2 [$ w5 Y% Z9 N
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& r [& T1 t! Z, L! ?$ h+ [. a; c
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714# E/ L7 u( b- b# t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) O, q+ K% f# I, }- J Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
) i1 V& C5 v% G: @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 ]" `: ~1 R4 l! j8 A! |
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
* `) x- u4 f. J5 o# p& K! N -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% K Z( T* P) A National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
9 O) o1 p8 l5 Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. x8 S8 v3 T- G. B+ v9 s0 U5 S/ ^) T/ ?+ e
-------------------------------------------------------------! Q7 O: Z0 `$ s, r# T$ j
Standard Condominium
# b3 r. i, W9 _ -------------------------------------------------------------
6 X& x- Q( T8 g1 P 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo7 {2 F3 n0 D) G( E7 O) _7 H
Market % Change Average Average % Change
8 ? ^3 x( _8 Y7 z& v. q( l f -------------------------------------------------------------, N# _; y& T1 c; ~) \" y: a
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
( ] F( j: |. ^* V" o0 i. w ------------------------------------------------------------- T! {5 h+ O# m( @& z
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%6 p3 g! o" G& k
-------------------------------------------------------------
. C7 y, p0 m9 @" h8 _, q1 T Moncton 4.9% - - N/A( f1 Q# V# i. o. P3 |8 a$ f( h
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 v1 ]1 ]& ^; ?3 z/ P Saint John N/A - - N/A0 M6 d1 D7 C! R7 p
-------------------------------------------------------------3 P0 _3 b8 W5 Y7 f; E; Q
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%, m2 T5 o$ t1 {% g( q+ X
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ H; D: \5 N( y$ G- j Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
1 [' @; L0 w9 p -------------------------------------------------------------# m4 G1 o6 T. K, C# [
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
5 L8 J$ T& o1 {1 s. @- R$ l! k -------------------------------------------------------------$ t- `" e$ ]- {( G6 g; n/ {% ]) B2 u
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%5 k9 m- H \3 a$ c# b
-------------------------------------------------------------# U$ K$ u' J7 A& E: g
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
1 [6 d( s% _+ W8 I! x$ ]& K; M -------------------------------------------------------------
P. n7 U+ U# J Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%3 E4 _- f. d) l. g: n) ?: O9 g2 k
-------------------------------------------------------------5 @2 b- X5 t3 _
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
8 j6 M3 U+ O9 ^. A5 I. T2 I6 W, q -------------------------------------------------------------8 ~* t z. O% {9 X6 I( ^
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
, F8 J1 y, s* K0 }8 h7 M -------------------------------------------------------------
5 d' |0 P7 t# [/ f- G B" ]' m Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
$ d7 Q& L% k4 O) }# F -------------------------------------------------------------
M5 C% S" ` r Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
9 Q$ A' j7 k" i2 J% T -------------------------------------------------------------
4 b- m$ n2 a: ]) s% Q Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
+ t2 L+ e9 U- e1 R" i( L -------------------------------------------------------------
9 K: ^% f# C# n1 F* Z- N National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
]9 T8 o" w( t _) E! d -------------------------------------------------------------7 P8 {: z; i# ~ z% `5 P' I' K
>>
5 }! J* w7 {. K% ~ Q" p" J2 I+ t- g3 A" L. [; k& W4 D
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined/ c9 D u' {) `4 t& J( v1 Z
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
# |0 i7 I9 D. C: q6 f Y1 jJohn and Victoria.
* u0 t3 B# F, R. W
! v3 \% H3 [ `7 K' H The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
6 q& Z: q, i0 x- gcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
3 U3 _. K6 Y; o: _9 y- c& J w4 i, y8 shousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release. S& d @; R* [" X! h
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price- q8 t- r2 c0 t" C
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities- ]- d9 @: \: z' v* x. c) }
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is6 \8 q. R. Y# Q- s' N
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current8 q5 `/ y$ Z; n+ v" b+ D
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
9 u( F/ _6 m. D6 Pversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on* ~6 J# A, Z$ a
November 15, 2006.& p1 G0 R1 n. P
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
) d# F8 u! v7 ?2 S% }fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge' W Y/ M; z# m7 w+ R& @- k
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
4 k5 h! C+ s- O: B3 C$ R8 B. f# ?available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|