好消息， 帮你省税！

parklane

大家都知道加拿大的税很高，收入3万，除去CPP及EI外，要缴税$4196， 帕克兰公司可帮你省税$1229
收入4万,要缴税$6784， 可省$2130, 收入5万,要缴税$9958，可省$3051.  收入越高，省税越多！
  z$ y) x5 @3 m% o9 F# _6 j" f
. f/ J1 n. S/ a/ q4 \: r) D想知道如何省税?  请报名参加11月9日帕克兰公司总裁Ron Olsthoorn(加拿大资深律师及会计师）的讲座．
* A  a4 V* @/ Q9 B$ a" e
" o6 q  H' H2 J% Z地点：Delta Edmonton South (4404 Gateway Boulevard)
时间：11月9日 7:00 pm
联系人：帕克兰公司加西代表 Peng Zhou
: P/ ]4 D" V7 e: B, h电话：920-0853
email: pzhou@excite.com
+ \, W7 E- J+ B/ i
$ \5 S5 X" y' T% f$ |3 @% ?费用全免，名额有限，报名从速！

精打细算

ok... Buy low, donate high scheme. get a tax credit before CRA change it's rule.
, G$ F% b9 M2 M" \2 p. P$ ^5 t
$ ^! p6 H7 L! Q/ i3 r4 M. eDo you guys have any office here in Edmonton ?

whoswho

好像以前有人用这种方法，后来吃了官司，但判决结果还没出来。(记不太清楚)

多伦多来客

到底合不合法呢 ？

精打细算

风险大。

精打细算

过往好几家公司走法律漏洞， 买了些艺术品， 然后再作“鉴定“， 让涨价好几百倍的艺术品送给慈善机构给扣税回条， 变相买5刀， 回扣100刀。
7 G2 G9 u' C" }
. i" A' z+ y# G+ L/ k% D7 Z* i+ R以我个人观点， 少惹为妙。 虽说 parkland 公司本身有 500,000 替客户打官司， 但是，惹上了税务局，翻查起几年的税务可不是闹昨玩的！

而且， 当税务局开始审查时，一般上该公司所有客户都会成为audit 对象。

以上纯属个人见解。

多伦多来客

原帖由 精打細算 于 2006-11-6 14:55 发表
, ^4 ~3 B2 ^4 s- N) w风险大。

意思是不合法？没查算运气？

精打细算

理论上来说是合法。 所以说是法律漏洞。 完全取决于 tax auditor。 他们可以用好些技术性的错漏来咬你。 你可以上法院争论去。

parklane

Thanks a lot for the comments.  According the canadian law, this program is 100 percent legal.  Come to the seminor and find out from the lawyer and accountant point.  Yes, there were lots of companies to try to save the tax.  96 percent them were closed because Canadian goverment changes the law in December 1994.  The parklane company survived because they are doing business based on the law.  Parlane has office in Toronto and Winnepig, not in alberta yet.

[ 本帖最后由 parklane 于 2006-11-6 23:29 编辑 ]

parklane

I got lots of email register this siminar, please type in your full name and phone number, which is the only information I want to know.  Thanks!

精打细算

might drop in briefly if I have a chance. I'm having a conference today until god knows when.. Interested in getting your flyers if it's full

jxsimon

Warning: Tax shelter gifting arrangements are risky
$ o, X% @' x7 v' D8 l
On April 20, 2006, the Supreme Court of Canada announced that it would not hear the taxpayers' appeals of the decisions of the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) in the cases of Frank Klotz and Quinn, Tolley and Nash. These decisions involved buy-low, donate-high art flipping arrangements in which the taxpayers purchased artworks and donated them to charities. The charities issued donation receipts for three or four times the donors' costs, so that the tax refunds exceeded the costs to the donors. The FCA held that the value of the donations was limited to the amount of cash that the taxpayers paid for the artworks.
; ^) I$ @8 f: t8 u
% q" G0 Q1 D* ~, _  [! lDespite these favourable court decisions for the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), and despite proposed amendments to the Income Tax Act announced by the Department of Finance on December 5, 2003, some donation arrangements continue to be promoted. We have previously reminded taxpayers that the proposed amendments are applicable to years after 2003. They limit donations made under tax shelters and other arrangements to a maximum of the donor's out-of-pocket costs.
# n8 h0 h( k8 ^$ V4 R
9 ^9 M% k0 U5 {7 B/ ^* Nhttp://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/newsroom/alerts/2006/a061031-e.html

howardxue

That's not the case, their case may involve leveraged cash donations, but the decision haven't been made by Court yet.

bin8922

能不能请精打细算给个意见？我去听了。觉得有一些风险。

精打细算

我那天正好有事，去不了，　想向ＬＺ索取资料。

jxsimon

278％退税,上帝送给谁的礼物
, P3 v6 B( p. Y& Phttp://www.westca.com/News/article/sid=30509.html
http://www.westca.com/News/article/sid=30614.html

parklane

For the people who missed the last seminar, here is the last seminars for the year in Alberta . Monday Dec 11, 2006.    Greenwood Inn Hotel ( Cedar Room)   There will be 2 meetings held that day. Time  2:30 PM & 7:30 PM.